When the document receives its proper bibliographic information, Papers 2 names and stores it in accordance with the Library Preferences which I set as follows:.In other cases, I enter the bibliographic data (most importantly author, year, and title) manually. If the imported document has a DOI (as most scientific articles), Papers automatically matches it with an online database such as Google Scholar or Web of Science and assigns all bibliographic information (author, year, title, journal, etc.).(Alternatively, Papers can automatically import all files added to a particular folder). The document is then automatically imported into Papers using a Hazel rule triggered by a tag (“papers” in my case).a scientific article) attached to an email or download such a document from the Internet, I tag it (Mavericks, the next version of OS X, has built-in tagging compatible with OpenMeta) This is how I manage reference files using Papers 2: The user has high degree of control over how PDF documents are named and stored in Papers 2. One of the great features of Papers 2 (and its main competitor Sente) is its logical and accessible handling of files. However, I also have a major concern, so serious that it may force me to stay with Papers 2 or switch to another reference management software. Nevertheless, I have gradually started to appreciate the smoothness of its many features, such as search for new references, editing authors, assigning keywords and collections, and annotating by underlining text. Papers 3 has an entirely new user interface which takes some time to get used to. I have started trying the beta-version of Papers 3, an update of Papers 2, my favorite citation, bibliography and pdf management app. File management in Papers 3 has improved.įollow further developments in Papers app on Macademic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |